Errata



Errata from the Circuit Court briefs.

E1. Should be In re Pirko, not In re Pinko.

E2. Should be Melton, not Merton.

E3. While East Hartford Education Ass'n v. East Hartford Bd. of Educ. 562 F.2d 856 (2d Cir. 1977) was an en banc decision that required the teacher to wear a tie, it was not a 7-7-1 decision, but a 10-2 decision. The 7-7-1 en banc decision was instead Karr v. Schmidt, 460 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1972), a school hair-length case.

E4. The actual quote is in Richardson v. Hills Department Store, unpublished, No. L-99-1159 (Lucas Cty., Dec. 30, 1999), which cited Hammond v. Moon, 8 Ohio App.3d 66, 68 (Ohio 1982).

E5. Should be Burns v. Schnuck Markets, not Christine Burns v. Schnuck Markets, and adjusted alphabetically.

E6. The actual case name is Hudak v. Valleyaire Golf Club, Inc., not Hudak v. Dorrier.

E7. The correct page number is 30.




Errata from the Appellate Court briefs.

E8. The quote is from Cockrel v. Shelby County School Dist., 270 F.3d 1036 (6th Cir. 2001), which is citing Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986).

E9. The quote is actually from Fuehrer v. Westerville City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 61 Ohio St.3d 201, 574 N.E.2d 448 (1991).

E10. The actual quote is in Kreimer v. Bureau of Police, 958 F.2d 1242 (3d Cir. 1992). United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 377 (1968) actually references the O'Brien test: "a government regulation is sufficiently justified if it is within the constitutional power of the Government; if it furthers an important or substantial governmental interest; if the governmental interest is unrelated to the suppression of free expression; and if the incidental restriction on alleged First Amendment freedoms is no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest." Q> The O'Brien test is considered basically equivalent to the "time, place, and manner" intermediate scrutiny test.

E11. The actual quote is in Huron Valley Hosp. Inc. v. Pontiac, 887 F.2d 710, 714 (6th Cir. 1989) which cited Baker v. McCollan, 443 U.S. 137, 146 (1979).




Errata from the Petition for Rehearing

E12. The correct citation is 39 CFR 232.1.

E13. This should be JA 260.

E14. This is the exact same stupid mistake as in E9. The quote is actually from Fuehrer v. Westerville City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 61 Ohio St.3d 201, 574 N.E.2d 448 (1991).